[dmd-concurrency] tail-shared by default?

[Walter Bright]

Walter Bright wrote:
>
> If I understood you correctly, you are not talking about adjusting the 
> type, but about having something not be shared because it's a local. 
> Having special case rules often sound good, but later turn out to have 
> unforeseen consequences (C++ is full of them). They are best avoided 
> as much as possible.
>

One egregious example of that I wrote about recently is C's conflating 
of arrays with pointers under some circumstances.