[dmd-concurrency] A synchronized storage class?

[Walter Bright]

Also, adding a synchronized qualifier works only for variables, and not 
for other lvalues (like *p).

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Adding a "synchronized" qualifier (with the semantics of tail-shared) 
> has been discussed before. Our interim conclusion was that there is 
> enough information inside synchronized methods to dispense with that 
> particular qualifier.
>
> We would very much like to _not_ add new qualifiers unless absolutely 
> necessary. Your examples don't express that necessity - if you simply 
> remove the "synchronized" qualifier off i and j, the compiler has 
> enough information to do what's needed.
>
>