[dmd-concurrency] shared arrays, real, shared classes, synchronized classes

[Robert Jacques]

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:03:15 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> 6. When defining an object of a synchronized of shared type, you still  
> need to qualify it with "shared" in order to make it so. For example:
>
> synchronized class A { ... }
> shared A a; // fine
> A b;        // error
>
> (I'm not 100% sure about this.)

While I like the auto-documentation portion of this, this is inconsistent  
with scope classes. It's also redundant, particularly when we start naming  
classes ConcurrentQueue, etc. to differentiate them from their local  
cousins.