[dmd-internals] Backtraces under Linux
Steve Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 6 04:47:57 PDT 2010
Can the demangling be done lazily? That is, you only demangle when the
stack-trace is printed?
If stack traces must be constructed at throw time and that involves heavy GC
usage, this is a non-starter, because exceptions can be used for flow control,
not just printing.
-Steve
>
>From: Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org>
>To: Discuss the internals of DMD <dmd-internals at puremagic.com>
>Sent: Thu, August 5, 2010 7:11:35 PM
>Subject: Re: [dmd-internals] Backtraces under Linux
>
>
>The blocker for adopting this code as-is is that it depends on Phobos.
> -L--export-dynamic still has to be added to linux/bin/dmd.conf in the install
>package, and I'm working on a demangler. I'd just copy the one from Phobos, but
>
>it works purely with strings using array concatenation and I want to avoid
>hitting the GC so hard when an exception is thrown. I've discovered that
>writing such a demangler is kind of a pain because things have to be reordered
>during demangling (where the qualified name is for function vs. non-function
>types, for example). Anyway, almost done, but it's taking the backseat to other
>
>work ATM. Thanks for the reminder!
>
>On Aug 4, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Jason House wrote:
>
>I just want to ensure this post to digitalmars.D doesn't get lost.
More information about the dmd-internals
mailing list