[dmd-internals] dmd commit, revision 534
Brad Roberts
braddr at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 14 10:16:58 PDT 2010
On 6/14/2010 6:02 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Brad Roberts, el 13 de junio a las 17:23 me escribiste:
>> On 6/13/2010 1:30 PM, Benjamin Shropshire wrote:
>>> Brad Roberts wrote:
>>>> The problem with incorporating fixes from other sources is the same as
>>>> for
>>>> source code, the license they're under. DStress has never made that
>>>> clear,
>>>> though it's intention is very clear.
>>>>
>>>
>>> IIRC some big swaths of DStress are explicitly linked to bug numbers.
>>> Either derived from code in the bug to written explicitly to show a
>>> specific bug. I wonder if the author of DStress (is he still around?)
>>> would, at a minimum, place /them/ under some acceptable license (or even
>>> public domain).
>>
>> Yes, many are either directly in bugzilla or linked from it. Since dstress is
>> gpl v2 (see other email on this thread)
>
> What issues do you find in using some test cases with GPL license in
> a test suite?
>
I really don't want to have tests under various licenses. It's overly confusing.
More information about the dmd-internals
mailing list