[dmd-internals] 3rd Biweekly Sprint Planning

[Kenji Hara via dmd-internals]

On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 09:18:45 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I would raise PRs for regressions and maintenance bug-fixes to 
> the 2.068 branch too.  It will take time, but 2.067 will be 
> dropped once gdc and ldc get up to 2.068.
>
> I know I am, and it looks like David is too still finding 
> issues with 2.067 that will need to be upstreamed somehow...

It means the version 2.067 of gdc and ldc contains more bug fixes 
than dmd 2.067. Of course it's not bad, but the bottom line is 
still dmd 2.067 behavior.

While we use "2.067" for the host compiler, inside dmd source 
code, we should avoid all codegen bugs that "dmd 2.067" has.

- Kenji