[ENet-discuss] Stronger UDP checksum?

[Kevin Wasserman]

I've got a user who seems to occasionally (every 

5 minutes or so, which is frequently enough) transmit 

a packet that becomes corrupted but apparently 

passes the UDP checksum and then naturally 

wreaks havok on my app.  I was wondering if 

anyone else had had a similar exerience and 

thinking that I might add an option to enet to 

provide a stronger checksum (e.g. CRC32) when 

sending a packet. For reliable packets, particularly, 

I think it makes sense to do it in enet rather than 

at a higher level.  Any thoughts?

 

-Kevin Wasserman

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20050601/2af9edf5/attachment.htm