[ENet-discuss] Bandwidth Monitoring?

[Beau Albiston]

It would be nice to have some statistics functions.  I would be most interested in things like bytes/sec sent/received at the socket, for instance.

-Beau

From: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas J Ingrassellino
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:16 AM
To: Discussion of the ENet library
Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Bandwidth Monitoring?

Ooohhh, I misunderstood their purpose. Is there a variable somewhere that will tell me how much data is going back and forth at any given time or do I need to do that myself?

________________________________

Nicholas J Ingrassellino
LifebloodNetworks.com<http://www.lifebloodnetworks.com/> || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com<mailto:nick at lifebloodnetworks.com>

"The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
- John Carmack on software patents

On 10/20/2010 10:19 PM, Lee Salzman wrote:
They're never updated and merely hold the values you pass in when you create the host.

Lee

On 10/19/2010 10:13 AM, Nicholas J Ingrassellino wrote:
Is there something special I have to do to get _ENetPeer.incomingBandwidth and _ENetPeer.outgoingBandwidth working? I am using both reliable and unreliable packets but these values are always zero. For example, if I do std::cout << event.peer->incomingBandwidth; inside my main loop I get bumpkis. Also, how often are they updated?

________________________________

Nicholas J Ingrassellino
LifebloodNetworks.com<http://www.lifebloodnetworks.com/> || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com<mailto:nick at lifebloodnetworks.com>

"The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
- John Carmack on software patents








_______________________________________________

ENet-discuss mailing list

ENet-discuss at cubik.org<mailto:ENet-discuss at cubik.org>

http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20101021/336e8988/attachment-0001.html>