[ENet-discuss] ENet bandwidth problems

[Stefan Lundmark]

Just wanted to chime in, but say that I've never had any issue like this 
and I'm transferring at 10mbit/s on my wireless by sending data in 
64-256kbit chunks at once per ENet packet.
I'm not sure why you're getting such slow transfer-speeds, fragmenting 
or not.

Sincerely,
Stefan

On 2012-08-28 23:47, Pablo de Heras Ciechomski wrote:
> Thanks Lee and thanks Dennis! It was fragmentation and now the
> sleep command makes a difference again. Fixed.
>
> Pablo
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Lee Salzman <lsalzman at gmail.com 
> <mailto:lsalzman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     You could try the ENET_PACKET_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT option if you
>     really need fragmentation but your packet sizes are still only a
>     handful of multiples of MTU.
>
>     I would make the packets smaller than 1400 if you want to avoid
>     all fragmentation, though, 1300ish would be safer since it leaves
>     room for headers.
>
>
>     On 08/29/2012 12:01 AM, Pablo de Heras Ciechomski wrote:
>
>         Kind of solved,
>         Made the packets into less than 1400 bytes and now it's
>         faster. I guess it
>         has to do with fragmentation.
>         Pablo
>
>         On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Pablo de Heras Ciechomski
>         <pablo.deheras at gmail.com <mailto:pablo.deheras at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:pablo.deheras at gmail.com
>         <mailto:pablo.deheras at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
>             Hello,
>
>             I am playing around with unreliable unordered packets in
>         ENet and I am
>             trying to figure out why I am not transferring fast
>         enough. My packets are
>             all around 1800 bytes and are sent continuously. I seem to
>         get the same
>             speed on most any machine independent of wifi/Gigabit
>         LAN/local intra-
>             process communication. This is disturbing to me as I don't
>         understand
>             why. I am using the same loop as in the tutorial and I am
>         getting no more
>             than 250kB/s transfer rates, when it should be around
>         10MB/s in the best
>             scenario. Is it due to all the packet_create calls? Is it
>         due to some internal
>             throttling? Packets don't seem to be lost so I am at loss :-)
>
>             I changed the timer to 0 ms wait on the host loop function
>         if that makes
>             any difference, but it doesn't seem so. Adding or removing
>         a 5m Sleep
>             (windows function so working on the whole process) doesn't
>         seem to make
>             any change other than making the whole system unresponsive
>         if removed.
>             Pablo
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         ENet-discuss mailing list
>         ENet-discuss at cubik.org <mailto:ENet-discuss at cubik.org>
>         http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ENet-discuss mailing list
>     ENet-discuss at cubik.org <mailto:ENet-discuss at cubik.org>
>     http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20120829/19afec8d/attachment.html>