[ENet-discuss] NAT punch through (again)

[Jay Sprenkle]

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Adrian Friedli <adi at koalatux.ch> wrote:

>
> NAT was never intended to be a security feature, it's just there to delay
> IPv4
> exhaustion.
>
>
I thought it was invented so I didn't have to pay the cable company for
every individual computer on my network  ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20120607/d0aaf624/attachment.html>