[ENet-discuss] Reducing traffic from ENet internally on mobile devices

[Stefan Lundmark]

Well, something is. I've commented out all uses of enet_peer_send(), so 
the two peers are connected but do not send any packets.

And there's no difference. I still get lots of traffic.

On 2013-08-20 15:19, Lee Salzman wrote:
> Ping doesn't go through enet_peer_queue_incoming_command, only user 
> data. That means you are sending data, not ENet.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Stefan Lundmark 
> <stefanlun at hotmail.com <mailto:stefanlun at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Lee and thanks for your response!
>
>     But the ping functions get called (after modifying
>     ENET_PEER_PING_INTERVAL) every ~30 seconds yet
>     enet_peer_queue_incoming_command() is called every second or so on
>     both sides. Wireshark shows packets of 50 and 52 bytes size being
>     sent back and forth at the same rate.
>     I'll check what types of commands those are.
>
>     Sincerely,
>     Stefan
>
>
>     On 2013-08-20 14:51, Lee Salzman wrote:
>>     Remember, pings are bidirectional.
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Stefan Lundmark
>>     <stefanlun at hotmail.com <mailto:stefanlun at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         I've been using ENet on Android for a while now and it works
>>         great, thanks!
>>
>>         However, it wakes up the network device very often (every
>>         ~0.5 secs) and thus consumes a lot of battery. I figured this
>>         must be caused by the pings so I changed these to be sent
>>         much more rarely.
>>         I placed a breakpoint in the ping functions and it seems to
>>         work, they're called much less. Unfortunatly the device still
>>         wakes up as often as before,
>>         enet_peer_queue_incoming_command() is called each time so
>>         there must be something I'm missing, maybe some internal
>>         protocol stuff I don't understand yet.
>>
>>         Any tips? I can't figure it out.
>>
>>         Sincerely,
>>         Stefan Lundmark
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         ENet-discuss mailing list
>>         ENet-discuss at cubik.org <mailto:ENet-discuss at cubik.org>
>>         http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     ENet-discuss mailing list
>>     ENet-discuss at cubik.org  <mailto:ENet-discuss at cubik.org>
>>     http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ENet-discuss mailing list
>     ENet-discuss at cubik.org <mailto:ENet-discuss at cubik.org>
>     http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20130820/6ab4b42a/attachment.html>