[ENet-discuss] Reducing traffic from ENet internally on mobile devices
Lee Salzman
lsalzman at gmail.com
Tue Dec 17 08:26:24 PST 2013
You must be misinterpeting something, because ENet will never spontaneously generate a SendReliable command. A Ping command will generate an Acknowledge command. But unless you're doing something horribly wrong I can't fathom, the Acknowledge and the reverse Ping will get batched together into one packet where is suits.
On 12/17/2013 06:02 PM, Krasimir Marinov wrote:
> I understand the purpose of the ping, but wonder why after PING, the 50B packet, another one with size 52B is sent immediately?
>
> I though that just PINGs should be sent on each ping interval….and that’s why I wonder what is the purpose of the other packet?
>
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Lee Salzman <lsalzman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> See: enet_peer_ping_interval
>>
>> http://enet.bespin.org/group__peer.html#gacddc2107f6e6b9e39812c1dfecff335b
>>
>>
>> On 12/17/2013 05:39 PM, Krasimir Marinov wrote:
>>>
>>> I’d like to join the discussion that had been started 3-4 months ago, because I experience the behaviour described by Stefan.
>>>
>>> Monitoring an idle ENet connection with Wireshark reveals that each 500ms a 50B packet (real data is 8B - 4B length = 4B = ENetProtocolPing) is sent from the initiator of the connection
>>> to the “server”. The “server” immediately responds with PING (50B UDP packet, data = 8B).
>>> Immediately after that another packet is sent to the “server”with length 52B (real data is 10B, which makes 10B - 4B length = 6B = ENetProtocolSendReliable).
>>> The server responds immediately with another ENetProtocolSendReliable.
>>>
>>> This sequence of packets is repeated every 500ms. I understand the PING, but why is the other packet sent?
>>>
>>> P.S. The scheme looks like:
>>>
>>> Client Server
>>> ————————————>50B (ENetProtocolPing)
>>>
>>> 50B(ENetProtocolPing)<———————————————
>>>
>>> ———————————>52B(ENetProtocolSendReliable)
>>>
>>> 52B(ENetProtocolSendReliable)<—————————————
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 500ms
>>>
>>> the same repeats
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is the initial email:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Lee and thanks for your response!
>>>
>>> But the ping functions get called (after modifying
>>> ENET_PEER_PING_INTERVAL) every ~30 seconds yet
>>> enet_peer_queue_incoming_command() is called every second or so on both
>>> sides. Wireshark shows packets of 50 and 52 bytes size being sent back
>>> and forth at the same rate.
>>> I'll check what types of commands those are.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
More information about the ENet-discuss
mailing list