[ENet-discuss] enet 1.3.6 dll for .net

[Lee Salzman]

Yep, the freeCallback gets called when the ref count goes to zero. That's
what it is for. :)


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Syed Setia Pernama <syedhs at yahoo.com>wrote:

> Actually within ENet there is undocumented callback that get triggered
> when a reliable packet was succesfully received. Logically speaking,
> ENet must know the packet has been received properly, otherwise ENet will
> resend the packet (that is requirement for reliable packets).
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Benoit Germain <bnt.germain at gmail.com>
> *To:* Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:19 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [ENet-discuss] enet 1.3.6 dll for .net
>
>
>
> 2013/2/26 James Bellinger <james at illusorystudios.com>
>
> With either referenceCount or freeCallback, how are you differentiating
> disconnection from acknowledge?
> For example, enet_peer_disconnect (Peer.Disconnect) calls
> enet_peer_reset_queues.
>
>
> I don't. It happens that I haven't encountered a situation where I care
> though, so I didn't think about it :-).
>
>
> As a general thought:
>
> I wonder if it'd be useful to have a 'delivered count' on the packet
> itself.
>
> What is the specific use both of you get from knowing if a packet has been
> delivered though?
>
> I've not needed it myself, since if it's delivered, the protocol
> continues, and if it's not delivered, well,
> reliable delivery will eventually either deliver it or the remote party
> will disconnect, so I don't have
> to pay attention to this.
>
>
> I have a toy chat application where I can send data to several recipients.
> I use it to log the fact that all recipients did receive the text I sent.
> Nothing critical.
>
>
>
>
> Benoit:
>
> I don't see ENet setting the packet freeCallback anywhere. I believe it's
> unrelated to the malloc/free.
>
>
> Yes you are right, I didn't check the code. Well then it means I can
> change my binding to use this instead of maintaining a list of packets for
> acknowledgment notification. (this packet callback didn't exist when I
> implemented this feature).
>
>
> --
> Benoit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20130227/5bae399e/attachment-0001.html>