[ENet-discuss] dangerous about function enet_host_flush
Syed Setia Pernama
syedhs at yahoo.com
Fri May 3 04:52:39 PDT 2013
Provide two queues, one is for sending and another is for packet receiption. Both queues must have thread safety.
________________________________
From: Ruud van Gaal <ruud at racer.nl>
To: zxz3121 <zxz3121 at gmail.com>; Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] dangerous about function enet_host_flush
ENet isn't thread-safe, as you found out.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:49 AM, zxz3121 at gmail.com <zxz3121 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>when I use two different threads for receive package and send
package I found that when I use enet_host_flush in send thread may occur
Thread synchronization problem randomly, because
enet_host_flush and enet_host_service may call the
enet_protocol_send_outgoing_commands function at the sametime,even I
use the pthread_mutex_t in my threads it`s crash randomly anyway!
>________________________________
>zxz3121 at gmail.com
>_______________________________________________
>ENet-discuss mailing list
>ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
ENet-discuss at cubik.org
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20130503/f0e8a722/attachment.html>
More information about the ENet-discuss
mailing list