[ENet-discuss] Only 15% of unreliable packets getting from Singapore to USA
Tom Spencer-Smith
tom at meanfox.com
Wed Jul 23 23:34:04 PDT 2014
OK good - I am hoping the mistake is on my side because I'd really like to
use ENet.
I'll write a minimal client and server and if I can still repro the problem
and can't see any mistake I'll post the code here.
Cheers
Tom
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Lee Salzman <lsalzman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Between receiving packets out of order and this, it sounds like you're
> doing something silly like overwriting the packet or otherwise corrupting
> it before it can be sent. I'd check your own code first before asserting
> there are bugs with ENet, which I'm pretty sure there are not.
>
>
> On 07/24/2014 07:28 AM, Tom Spencer-Smith wrote:
>
>> Running locally, all the packets are received on the event, so in the
>> above case the latency appears to cause bad behavior.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Tom Spencer-Smith <tom at meanfox.com
>> <mailto:tom at meanfox.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Another problem I'm noticing is that sending a lot of small packets
>> (payload around 100 bytes) from Singapore client to US server, with a rtt
>> of around 200ms and no simulated packetloss: only a small fraction of the
>> packets are being delivered to the server via ENET_EVENT_TYPE_RECEIVE-
>> around 15%. However, the ENetHost metrics totalSentPackets/totalReceivedPackets
>> pretty much match up.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20140724/97a815cc/attachment.html>
More information about the ENet-discuss
mailing list