[phobos] Tango and the new time lib

[David Simcha]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is quite possibly the legal technicality of the year, though I believe
it would satisfy the requirements as literally interpreted.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ellery Newcomer <
ellery-newcomer at utulsa.edu> wrote:

> Don Clugston <dclugston at ...> writes:
>
> >
> > I tried hard to get Tango to use the Boost license. More recently, I
> > tried to get the Boost license available as a standard option in the
> > Tango ddoc templates. They wouldn't even do that, and someone modified
> > my "support Boost license" ticket into "support Apache 2.0 license"
> > !!!!
> > I concluded that there is little chance of healing the Tango-Phobos
> > rift, because there are people on the Tango side who do not want
> > unity.
> > Sadly, it only takes one to tango.
> >
>
>
> What's the consensus over here on the tango team's solution to the binary
> attribution clause? They say they're going to include the license as a
> static
> string somewhere in the source code to pull the bother off the user.
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20100429/dbd70e98/attachment.html>