[phobos] Proposal of StopWatch module
Lars Tandle Kyllingstad
lars at kyllingen.net
Tue Aug 17 05:17:04 PDT 2010
Near the bottom of SHOOs e-mail, he does explicitly say he didn't look
at Tango.
I see no reason not to trust that, similar APIs notwithstanding. There
really aren't that many ways to make a sensible stopwatch API -- you
need a start(), a stop(), and some way to extract the time inbetween in
various units. std.perf.PerformanceCounter looks like that too.
-Lars
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 05:05 -0700, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> in anticipation of what might happen...
>
> Tango does have a StopWatch object, it looks like this (API only):
>
> void start()
> Start the timer
> double stop()
> Stop the timer and return elapsed duration since start()
> ulong microsec()
> Return elapsed time since the last start() as microseconds
> static this()
> Setup timing information for later use
> ulong timer() [private, static]
> Return the current time as an IntervalI hate to do this, but I don't want to
> incur any more issues from the Tango team. Have you looked at this tango module
> before writing your StopWatch object (note the StopWatch module is separate from
> the other tango modules)?
>
> -Steve
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: SHOO <zan77137 at nifty.com>
> > To: phobos at puremagic.com
> > Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 6:43:41 AM
> > Subject: [phobos] Proposal of StopWatch module
> >
> > I made the module of the stopwatch, so I suggest it again here.
> >
> > I suggested a time handling module that I called std.time before.
> > Unfortunately itself was not able to contribute to Phobos for the issue
> > of license. But, an important function was included in it. It is what is
> > the StopWatch suggested this time.
> >
> > I have some knowledge about machine control engineering. In the field of
> > the machine control engineering, the high accuracy time measurement
> > often plays an important role.
> > For example, the case wants to perform the measurement of the voltage
> > with time by millisecond order for feedback control. When it looks like
> > it, resolution power is not enough by time acquisition such as C's time
> > function in many cases.
> >
> > Or the high accuracy time measurement is important in the game
> > programming, too. Or in benchmark testing, too.
> >
> > There is std.perf in Phobos as a module with this role now.
> > However, the module is unlisted, and a license doesn't seem to be a
> > Boost license, too.
> > I did not refer Tango at all about this class and examined and made it
> > in my own hand completely.
> >
> > Here is the module to suggest this time:
> > http://ideone.com/TVw1P
> >
> > # This module is tested by Windows (real) and Ubuntu (virtual PC).
> >
> > Please look at it once by all means, and review it.
> > I think that I will commit it at 2010-08-22T15:00Z as far as there is
> > not serious dissenting opinion.
> > _______________________________________________
> > phobos mailing list
> > phobos at puremagic.com
> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
More information about the phobos
mailing list