[phobos] enforce() vs. assert() for range primitives
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisprog at gmail.com
Sat Aug 21 18:37:38 PDT 2010
On Saturday 21 August 2010 16:34:02 David Simcha wrote:
> I disagree for two reasons:
>
> 1. enforce() generates so much code that it's likely that very few
> compilers would inline it, and then also inline the function calling it.
I thought that the issue wasn't so much that enforce() isn't inlined as that a
function which called enforce() isn't inlined.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the phobos
mailing list