[phobos] Silent failure of std.container unittests
Andrei Alexandrescu
andrei at erdani.com
Fri Jul 16 22:25:29 PDT 2010
On 07/17/2010 12:08 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Yes, for that sequence, the rest are irrelevant. But what I don't
> understand is why is it so bad that they also generate messages, which
> you just ignore looking over the log file? Me, I'd rather see a few
> extra cascaded messages, fix the ones that matter and ignore the extra,
> than be short messages and have to rebuild/rerun the tests just to get
> dinged again.
If you were 100% committed to that position, your compiler would
continue parsing after an error. It doesn't.
Andrei
More information about the phobos
mailing list