[phobos] Silent failure of std.container unittests

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 07/17/2010 11:24 AM, Benjamin Shropshire wrote:
> The issue is that some people won't be getting "a few" extra messages to
> be ignored.They will get one message they want, followed by dozens that
> they need to ignore, followed by one they want, ...

Ha, never thought of it that way. That's because all unittests are run 
now. So essentially we have useful failure messages interspersed with 
useless contingent messages, instead of one useful failure message 
followed by useless contingent messages.

Andrei