[phobos] phobos commit, revision 1579

[Sean Kelly]

Yup.  I didn't do that because std.atomics wasn't listed in the phobos docs, so I didn't think it was supported.  But if you'd prefer we do that, I'll take care of it.

On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Walter Bright wrote:

> One way is to have std.atomic just do a public import of core.atomic, and provide aliases.
> 
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> I'm ok with it going away (on the assumption that the core version is complete enough (left open for debate), I haven't looked myself), but I'm also willing to bet that this change is going to break an interesting subset of the population of D2 users.
>> 
>> I'd rather see a deprecation warning for a couple versions.  Potentially publically importing core.atomic if that's a viable replacement during that timeframe.
>> 
>> My 2 cents,
>> Brad
>> 
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, dsource.org wrote:
>> 
>>  
>>> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:35:40 -0400
>>> From: dsource.org <noreply at dsource.org>
>>> Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
>>> To: phobos at puremagic.com
>>> Subject: [phobos] phobos commit, revision 1579
>>> 
>>> phobos commit, revision 1579
>>> 
>>> 
>>> user: sean
>>> 
>>> msg:
>>> Removed std.atomics.  It was never documented, so hopefully it can just silently vanish.
>>> 
>>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1579
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>> 
>>>    
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>> 
>> 
>>  
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos