[phobos] Phobos feature freeze?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

I don't think we need to feature-freeze Phobos. Ideally we'd find some 
time to work on its known bugs though.

Andrei

On 06/08/2010 09:24 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote:
> Now that TDPL is well on its way, are there any plans to freeze Phobos
> in the near future?
>
> (I'm asking because earlier I've proposed some pretty major changes to
> std.process and std.path, and I'm hoping to get both considered for
> inclusion before it's too late.)
>
> -Lars
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos