[phobos] phobos commit, revision 1678

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

I think just issuing an assert(isForwardRange!(typeof(repeat(1))) should 
suffice.

Andrei

On 06/22/2010 09:58 AM, David Simcha wrote:
> Realistically, how would you recommend testing something like this?  I
> checked to make sure that there was something instantiating each version
> of the structs to make sure that they compile (i.e. no silly syntax
> errors), and as for the logical correctness, it seemed like the code was
> so trivial that it would  be silly to write an explicit test for it.
> Furthermore, the precedent in the rest of Phobos seems to be that such
> trivial code does not require testing.
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com
> <mailto:braddr at puremagic.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 6/22/2010 5:31 AM, dsource.org <http://dsource.org> wrote:
>      > phobos commit, revision 1678
>      >
>      >
>      > user: dsimcha
>      >
>      > msg:
>      > Bug 4362:  std.range.repeat and cycle do not have a .save() method
>      >
>      > http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1678
>
>     Don't forget to add unit tests. :)
>     _______________________________________________
>     phobos mailing list
>     phobos at puremagic.com <mailto:phobos at puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos