[phobos] Definition of Random Access Range

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 06/23/2010 10:22 PM, David Simcha wrote:
> Should we just redefine random access ranges such that they must either
> have a length or be infinite?

I think that's reasonable. If a finite range didn't define length, it 
would be easy to find it in O(log n) by binary search.

> I'm trying to improve the unit tests in
> std.range in preparation for some bug fixing and consistency
> improvements and I'm finding the mother lode of bugs in the process
> (which I'll file or fix relatively soon).

Congrats to you and everybody else for the great work. Phobos is really 
starting to come together.


Andrei