[phobos] Suggestions for std.process
David Simcha
dsimcha at gmail.com
Thu Mar 4 13:53:44 PST 2010
(Bangs head against wall.) Sorry, meant 3409, 3410.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>wrote:
> I'm confused. 2409 is about delegates and 2410 also looks unrelated. I must
> be missing something.
>
> FWIW I recall I did solve the large file issue.
>
>
> Andrei
>
> David Simcha wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com<mailto:
>> schveiguy at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Will there be an unbuffered interface to file handles?
>> std.stdio.File wraps a FILE* which I find substandard. I don't
>> think D should be relying on C buffering for D-only constructs.
>>
>> I actually find the whole notion of relying on libc a little
>> suspect, even for the standard handles.
>>
>>
>> You will find it a lot suspect if you try to work with files over 2 GB.
>> See bugs 2409 and 2410.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20100304/d90f6c76/attachment.htm>
More information about the phobos
mailing list