[phobos] tie for std.typecons.Tuple
Andrei Alexandrescu
andrei at erdani.com
Sat May 29 07:02:38 PDT 2010
I think tie() should be removed because it is unsafe. Masahiro, could
you please look into that?
We should discuss alternative means, but I strongly believe whatever
abstractions we add should be, if at all possible, safe. But tie() is
not appropriate.
Andrei
On 05/10/2010 05:22 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, Phobos has Tuple but doesn't have tie.
> So I implemented tie for std.typecons.Tuple.
>
> http://www.bitbucket.org/repeatedly/scrap/src/tip/tie_.d
>
> Original author is 9rnsr but his version is a bit messy and overkill.
> I substantially rewrote his tie.
> - clear syntax (tie(&n, &d) => tie(n, d))
> - Implicit conversion
>
> I would like to suggest this tie is integrated into phobos.
>
> What do you think of this?
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
More information about the phobos
mailing list