[phobos] Community shout-out?

[SHOO]

LOL! This is terrible!

The performance is not so important for me, but this report moves me to 
tears.
What is a bottleneck?

--
SHOO

(2010/11/14 21:55), Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> A benchmark has shown that the Tango XML module is a lot faster than many of the XML libraries out there, specially than the Phobos module. So I would say that D could do better than other libraries at least when it comes to speed.
>
> http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/
>
> On 14 nov 2010, at 10:44, Russel Winder wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 15:35 +0900, SHOO wrote:
>>> About a problem of std.xml.
>>
>> Potentially n00b comment but . . .
>>
>> The Python community seem to be giving up on having their own library
>> for processing XML and are using bindings to libxml2 and libxslt.  Is it
>> likely that a D source XML library can do better than libxml2 and
>> libxslt or might it be better just to create a D idiomatic binding?
>>
>> --
>> Russel.
>> =============================================================================
>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>