[phobos] Community shout-out?

[Jacob Carlborg]

I don't know why Phobos is so slow but what I've heard Tango is fast because it never copies the input buffer, what I've heard.

On 14 nov 2010, at 16:10, SHOO wrote:

> LOL! This is terrible!
> 
> The performance is not so important for me, but this report moves me to tears.
> What is a bottleneck?
> 
> --
> SHOO
> 
> (2010/11/14 21:55), Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> A benchmark has shown that the Tango XML module is a lot faster than many of the XML libraries out there, specially than the Phobos module. So I would say that D could do better than other libraries at least when it comes to speed.
>> 
>> http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/
>> 
>> On 14 nov 2010, at 10:44, Russel Winder wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 15:35 +0900, SHOO wrote:
>>>> About a problem of std.xml.
>>> 
>>> Potentially n00b comment but . . .
>>> 
>>> The Python community seem to be giving up on having their own library
>>> for processing XML and are using bindings to libxml2 and libxslt.  Is it
>>> likely that a D source XML library can do better than libxml2 and
>>> libxslt or might it be better just to create a D idiomatic binding?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Russel.
>>> =============================================================================
>>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
>>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
>>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg