[phobos] Why ConvError and not ConvException?

[Shin Fujishiro]

Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Monday 15 November 2010 19:44:50 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > Historical reasons. I favor your implied change.
> 
> Enhancement request created: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5220
> 
> Hopefully someone with write access can get around to it before the next release 
> - particularly since it should be a very quick and simple change. In either 
> case, this way it won't be forgotten.

Okay, replaced all ConvError with ConvException.

By the way, it feels redundant for me to name every exception class
with an ending Exception, especially descriptive ones such as
ConvOverflowException.  Couldn't it be ConversionOverflow?


Shin