[phobos] next release

[Lars Tandle Kyllingstad]

I think we should make some kind of decision regarding the date/time
module(s) before releasing a Phobos version that contains std.stopwatch.

It would be silly to introduce a new module, only to deprecate it and
move Stopwatch into std.time (or whatever) in the following release...

-Lars



On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 22:03 +0900, SHOO wrote:
> (2010/09/09 9:48), Brad Roberts wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Brad Roberts wrote:
> >
> >> What's the state of the union?  Er.. code base?
> >>
> >> IMHO, it's about time to consider cutting the next release.  Who has
> >> opinions on what's unfinished that they believe needs to be in it?
> >
> > The only regularly failing unit test is in phobos.  I filed a ticket for
> > it the other day:
> >
> > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4824
> >    - stopwatch unit tests fail intermitently
> >
> > I think it should be fixed before the release.
> 
> I fixed. But, I didn't test it. I don't have environment repro the problem.
> Will you confirm it if good?
> 
> 
> BTW, I allow that revisions increase change without my permit because 
> the module is a part of Phobos. Of course include a change of the module 
> name. > Phobos Dev.
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos