[phobos] core.demangle replacing std.demangle?

[Jacob]

Seems unnecessary to have two demanglers and since the one in Phobos doesn't work correctly I suggest it should be removed.

On 10 sep 2010, at 16:01, Sean Kelly wrote:

> I wasn't sure whether to fix std.demangle now that core.demangle works, or to replace/deprecate it.  At the time I just needed something in druntime and I didn't like how std.demangle did everything via string ops. What do you all think?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 1:12 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net> wrote:
> 
>> I've noticed that Sean has recently added the core.demangle module to
>> druntime.  Does this mean we can deprecate std.demangle?  I've never
>> used it myself, but I seem to remember people saying on the NG that it
>> is pretty outdated.
>> 
>> -Lars
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg