[phobos] next release

[Don Clugston]

On 9 September 2010 23:38, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/10 16:27 CDT, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>>
>> Could we not put a warning in std.stopwatch like:
>>
>> "warning, std.stopwatch is experimental, and may change API/module name"
>
> No please.
>
>> I personally think std.datetime makes the most sense (with everything).
>>  But
>> clearly, an 11th hour decision without consensus or a complete
>> implementation
>> may not be the best idea.  Locking ourselves into something without
>> knowing what
>> it's going to look like doesn't make any sense to me.
>
> Then let's have std.stopwatch wait one more release cycle.

Four days later --
I've just looked at the Phobos source, and std.stopwatch is still in there!!!!
There's no more time for discussion on naming, it'll have to wait
until the next release.
Please somebody, pull it from this release NOW so that we can release a beta.