[phobos] returning void[] from std.file.read()
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Sat Sep 25 21:32:41 PDT 2010
On Saturday 25 September 2010 19:46:37 Robert Jacques wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:17:58 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
>
> <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> > This has come up in http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1482.
> > Should std.file.read() return void[] or ubyte[]? There's one matter with
> > assuming that void[] may contain pointers (which is not the case for
> > something read from a file), so possibly ubyte[] is a more accurate type
> > for describng raw bytes.
> >
> > What are the pros and cons of returning void[] vs. ubyte[]?
> >
> >
> > Andrei
>
> Pro:
> Well, the very first thing I always do with std.file.read is to cast the
> data to the type I'm working with. So:
>
> auto data = cast(float[])read("my_data.raw");
>
> vs.
>
> auto data = cast(float[])(cast(void[])read("my_data.raw"));
>
> Having read return ubyte would mean adding an extra cast in several use
> cases
Why would you need two casts? I would expect that one would suffice without the
need to cast to void[] in between.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the phobos
mailing list