[phobos] Could anyone rewrite win32.mak? (automated test failures)

[Shin Fujishiro]

Then, could anyone refactor win32.mak so that each module's tests run
individually like posix.mak?  I can't write/test digitalmars' makefile.


Shin

Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de> wrote:
> Yes, it's reproducible, but the effect can vary easily by 
> adding/removing symbols to/from the object file. I get "access 
> violation" or "Win32 exception" after an update.
> 
> The latest svn revision produces 16784 symbols causing any symbols above 
> 16384 to be relocated as the first symbols in the object file. See 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3372
> 
> A workaround is to split the compilation into two steps producing 
> smaller object files.
> 
> Rainer
> 
> Brad Roberts wrote:
> > I just updated that auto-tester to the 8.00.8 version of link.exe (I'd moved
> > stuff around and reverted to the .5 version that comes with the dmc.zip that I
> > have been using accidentally).  Run 900 and beyond use .8, but it doesn't help
> > with this bug.
> > 
> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
> > 
> > Later,
> > Brad
> > 
> > On 9/26/2010 4:42 AM, SHOO wrote:
> >>  Maybe, this problem is caused by OPTLINK.
> >>
> >> See also: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
> >>
> >> (2010/09/26 17:40), Brad Roberts wrote:
> >>> The automated win32 phobos tests started failing at the 22:20 test run.  Linux
> >>> is fine still.
> >>>
> >>> The error:
> >>>      http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?dataid=5766
> >>>
> >>>      unittest
> >>>      object.Error: Privileged Instruction
> >>>
> >>> The changes between this run and the previously successful run:
> >>>      http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/689
> >>>      http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2049
> >>>
> >>> Later,
> >>> Brad