[phobos] Time to get ready for the next release

[David Simcha]

On 4/23/2011 11:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> I think I would like to have something in the middle of strict and 
> loose semantics. I would like that functions marked with @property 
> have to be called like a field:
>
> auto bar = foo.field;
> foo.field = 3;
>
> But functions not marked with @property still can be called without 
> the parentheses:
>
> foo.bar();
> foo.bar;

Maybe there's been some misunderstanding, but actually this is what 
loose semantics means.  Loose semantics (at least as I understand them) 
mean stuff marked @property would not be callable using method syntax, 
and this rule would be used to disambiguate the corner cases, but 
nothing would change for stuff not marked @property.