[phobos] Time to get ready for the next release

[Steve Schveighoffer]

>From your answer, it seems like a case where keeping the status quo is the only acceptable path for you.  I don't think I can get any closer to your desired API without eliminating strict properties, which is not acceptable to me.  Frankly this argument is starting to seem very trivial.


There is no sense in continuing debate.


We'll have to see what happens.

-Steve




>________________________________
>From: David Simcha <dsimcha at gmail.com>
>To: Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>; Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [phobos] Time to get ready for the next release
>
>
>But such a proposal adds more complexity than is justified.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20110427/7b4f4fb0/attachment.html>