[phobos] std.parallelism: Request for review

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/26/11 8:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 2/26/2011 6:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Saturday 26 February 2011 12:39:16 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Yah, the newsgroup. The more eyes, the better.
>>
>> Yeah. Technically, I would argue that this _is_ the proper place (it _is_ the
>> Phobos list after all), but not enough people pay attention to this list. Most
>> everyone that pays attention to any of the D newsgroups pays attention to the
>> main D newsgroup, I think. So, anything that we want to have high visibility
>> needs to go there, if it makes more sense organizationally for it to go
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> I think the separation we have right now is a good one, worth maintaining.  This list is highly focused on the core
> developers and the raw mechanics of maintaining the code.  The newsgroups are more public and for more general
> discussion.  If the phobos list grew more general and chatty, I'd want to see phobos-dev@ or something created to
> re-isolate the mechanics parts.
>
> My 2 cents,
> Brad

Agreed. That stance still leaves library submissions to the newsgroup 
because they are of general interest. As a counterexample, a discussion 
about implementation policies inside the library would belong here.

Andrei