[phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

That scheme would be fine. But I think it's easier and less redundant to 
allow phobos and druntime build their own documentation (under 
d-programming-language.org's coordination) instead of putting that code 
inside d-programming-language.org's makefile.

Andrei

On 01/30/2011 02:51 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that phobos shouldn't be referencing ../d-programming-language.org in it's DOCSRC variable.  I'd
> prefer it if it was more standalone.  The d-p-l build should instead be pulling from subordinate packages (druntime,
> phobos).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Later,
> Brad
>
> On 1/29/2011 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in d-programming-language.org. Let me actually
>> post to digitalmars.D.
>>
>> I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 noreply at github.com wrote:
>>>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>>>> Home:   https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>>>>
>>>> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
>>>> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<andrei at erdani.com>
>>>> Date:   2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>>>>
>>>> Changed paths:
>>>>     M posix.mak
>>>>
>>>> Log Message:
>>>> -----------
>>>> Updated website-related build
>>>
>>> I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of
>>> complaining about files which don't exist?
>>>
>>> Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
>>>
>>> # Set DDOC, the documentation generator
>>> ifeq ($(OS),linux)
>>>       DDOC=dmd
>>> else
>>>       DDOC=dmd
>>> endif
>>>
>>> I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be
>>> used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the same
>>> thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
>>>
>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos