[phobos] Initial Phobos style guide proposal

[David Simcha]

In general I think this discussion is devolving into silly bikeshed issues.
I find that the stuff being discussed here doesn't have much effect on
readability (I can read code in lots of styles) but is annoying to have to
remember when writing code.

I'm fully on board with specifying anything that affects the public API.
For private implementation details, though, I think inconsistency across
modules is the lesser of two evils compared to fighting all these stupid
bikeshed wars over what the One True Way will be for Phobos.  I think the
most important rule is to just be consistent within a module.  When
maintaining a module written by someone else, try to adapt your style to
what you see.  When writing a new module, just use common sense and don't do
anything horribly unreadable.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>wrote:

> On 3/31/11 10:13 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>
>> I sugest people start using an editor that handles the *'s automatically.
>>
>
> Mine does, but in past discussions people have complained about overly
> specific requirements for editor capabilities.
>
> Andrei
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20110331/f046313d/attachment.html>