[phobos] Initial Phobos style guide proposal

[Brad Roberts]

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Walter Bright wrote:

> On 3/30/2011 8:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > These are intended to be general guidelines which are followed most of the
> > time but can be broken within reason (though hopefully that's relatively
> > rare).
> > 
> 
> I'd like to see this as changes (as necessary) to the D style guide
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dstyle.html, not as something distinct and
> possibly in contradiction with it.

I see the same thing happening this time that has happened during last 
discussions.  There's a core part that's agreed upon, but it's 
overshadowed by the discussion about the parts that aren't, and nothing 
happens.  I highly suggest getting the agreed upon parts captured in an 
appropriate doc.  The above one would be fine by me.

It's far easier to add rules to an existing list once it exists.

My 2 cents,
Brad