[phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] a15e68: Accidentally committed with a bunch of debugging c...

Lars Tandle Kyllingstad lars at kyllingen.net
Tue May 3 00:04:24 PDT 2011


On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 23:50 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On 5/2/11 11:09 PM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote:
> > > I can only speak for myself, but the reason I have been less active
> > > lately has nothing to do with git or github.  I am currently in the
> > > final stages of my PhD, and for the past few months I've been drowning
> > > in work.  (However, I've submitted my thesis for review now, and expect
> > > to have more time for D-related stuff -- at least until the defense date
> > > approaches...)
> > 
> > Good luck!
> > 
> > > Personally, I've found that what little programming I've done has been a
> > > lot more enjoyable after the switch to git.
> > 
> > Same here.
> > 
> > Generally my perception is quite the opposite - from what I can tell the
> > pace of development has been furious ever since we switch to github.
> 
> Oh, plenty has been going on since we switched to github, and I think that 
> it's a definite improvement, but I get the impression that fewer of the folks 
> who are actually Phobos devs have been committing code. It could be a false 
> impression though. Certainly, the activity on the main newsgroup with 
> proposals for inclusion in Phobos has increased. It just seems like there are 
> fewer Phobos devs actively committing code or creating pull requests. I'd have 
> to check the archives though to see whether that's true or not.

You don't have to check the archives. :)

    https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/graphs/impact

Also, the ohloh page for Phobos has some nice stats (see 'Code
Analysis', for instance):

    https://www.ohloh.net/p/libphobos

I think we're in good shape.

-Lars



More information about the phobos mailing list