[phobos] Parallel reviews of TempAlloc and std.path?
Jose Armando Garcia
jsancio at gmail.com
Mon May 30 13:44:03 PDT 2011
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad
<lars at kyllingen.net> wrote:
> My proposal for a new std.path is now ready for review, and it is my
> understanding that the same is true for David's TempAlloc. Would it be
> OK if we run the reviews in parallel? The two are completely
> independent, and AFAIK TempAlloc is meant for druntime, not Phobos.
>
>
> For the curious/impatient:
>
> https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/new-std-path/std/path.d
> http://www.kyllingen.net/code/new-std-path/phobos-prerelease/std_path.html
>
> -Lars
>
Quickly looked at the doc. Why is this true in glob?
---
assert (glob("foobar", "foo?bar"));
---
The doc says "? Matches exactly one instances of any character"
While you have the patient open can you fix the existing
documentation? What is "baseName("dir/file.ext") -->
"file.ext"? We should use assert. '-->' is not a D construct.
More information about the phobos
mailing list