[phobos] Parallel reviews of TempAlloc and std.path?

[Robert Jacques]

On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:38:31 -0400, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad  
<lars at kyllingen.net> wrote:
> My proposal for a new std.path is now ready for review, and it is my
> understanding that the same is true for David's TempAlloc.  Would it be
> OK if we run the reviews in parallel?  The two are completely
> independent, and AFAIK TempAlloc is meant for druntime, not Phobos.
>
>
> For the curious/impatient:
>
> https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/new-std-path/std/path.d
> http://www.kyllingen.net/code/new-std-path/phobos-prerelease/std_path.html
>
> -Lars

The reason reviews are run serially has nothing to do with whether they  
are independent or not; it has everything to do with the limited number of  
eyeballs available.