[phobos] next release

[Daniel Murphy]

We just had two weeks of (almost) nothing except regressions getting
pulled - you really want to do that again?  If an emergency release is
needed, it _should_ be done on another branch - there is no reason
development needs to stop.

I don't see why the import problems deserve special attention / a
special release.  They've been broken for a long time and like
everything else they should be merged when ready.

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 2/14/2012 9:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 20:54:43 Brad Roberts wrote:
>>> Please do NOT start pulling changes into either druntime or phobos yet.
>>> This last release was massive and there's a very real chance that we'll
>>> need to do a fairly quick turn around release with regression fixes.  Yes,
>>> it could be done on a branch, but ...
>>>
>>> Even if there isn't a flurry of new regressions to fix, I believe it worth a
>>> slide on other priorities to take the import and related visibility changes
>>> through to completion and in relative isolation.  Hopefully something like
>>> a 1-2 week release cycle instead of 2 months.
>>>
>>> Objections?
>>
>> I don't know. If we were going to be that quick about putting out another
>> release just to fix the import issues, why didn't we just delay the 2.058
>> release then?
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> Not particularly relevant since it is released.  Do you have an objection to the proposal that isn't based on altering
> the past? :)
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos