[phobos] open regression pull requests

[Walter Bright]

I also agree with putting priority on regressions at this point.

On 1/28/2013 7:29 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
> On 28 January 2013 15:58, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> There's a couple open bugs with pull requests that are in the regression and blocker severity levels.  It'd be good to
>> get those dealt with:
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=pull&query_format=advanced&keywords_type=allwords&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=bug_severity%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Cshort_desc%2Ckeywords&product=D&query_format=advanced&order=bug_severity%2Cbug_id&query_based_on=
>>
>> We're pretty much at the point where I think it's time to consider cutting a new release.  We're in the neighborhood of
>> 100 bugs fixed and it's been a month since the last release.  So, consider what's on your critical fix list and start
>> taking a look at the rest of the open regressions (there's currently 14) and let's get some polishing done.
>>
>> Yes, I know there's some fun heated discussions lately, but I don't believe any of them are so critical that they're on
>> the "must be done before the next release" list.  Getting regression fixes in the hands of users is much higher, imho.
> I agree. There's just one other optimizer bug worth mentioning:
> 6962, "Wrong Code With Scope Exit and Array Parameter, only with -O"
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>