[phobos] std.process deprecations

[Lars Tandle Kyllingstad via phobos]

On 07/08/14 21:29, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'd say we're good as we are. I agree repeating the argument is kind of
> meh but these are venerable functions instantly recognizable by many.
> Deprecating them in favor of new ones with minor cosmetic deltas gets
> close to wankery real quick. -- Andrei

I would say that proper error handling is more than a cosmetic delta.