What happened to GDMD

[Iain Buclaw]

On 27 February 2014 19:10, H. S. Teoh <hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:38:09AM +0000, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 23 Feb 2014 09:30, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling" <
>> joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 21/02/2014 18:09, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's not quite ready to replace the current script yet, as a number
>> >> of dmd options are still not handled (or not completely handled)
>> >> yet.
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you have a todo list ... ?
>
> Unfortunately, no. But basically, most of the remaining task is just to
> implement DMD option. The basic compile-and-link step is already
> working, but ddoc isn't handled yet, along with a whole bunch of dmd
> options that will probably require changing the way the compiling and
> linking is done, etc..
>
> Just try it out yourself to see what works / doesn't work, and you'll
> see. :)
>
> The parseArgs function is where you'd start looking, to see what has /
> hasn't been implemented as far as options go.
>
>
>> If so, put it on the wiki or raise separate bugs for each in bugzilla
>> to allow us to keep track what needs implementing.
>
> Should we be putting tickets in bugzilla when the dport branch isn't
> even merged yet?
>

Yes, you can use these as project tasks/goals to remind anyone what is
left to do. You could also create a separate branch as a staging area
to merge the current changes in. :)