master branch broken

Iain Buclaw ibuclaw at gdcproject.org
Mon Mar 31 10:06:44 PDT 2014


On 24 March 2014 07:34, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> wrote:
> On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> wrote:
>> On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
>>> Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700
>>> schrieb Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>:
>>>
>>>> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
>>>> >> See
>>>> >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13
>>>> >>
>>>> >> (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete
>>>> >> gdc rebuild to happen)
>>>> >
>>>> > Hmm, didn't see that either.
>>>>
>>>> Has the minimum base gcc version moved forward again?
>>>
>>> I don't think that's the case here, at least there's no obvious change
>>> that could require a newer snapshot.
>>>
>>
>> In this case, it's a GCC GC bug.
>>
>> Fix incoming.
>
> Still failing with a second unrelated issue.  Looks like wrong code
> sent to back-end  (trying to compile an ERROR_MARK) - I probably
> exposed a couple wrong handling of errors in the backend through some
> refactoring.   What I might end up doing is submitting a new visitor
> to walk all trees and assert if an error expression is found, that at
> least safe guards me from having to put in workarounds to handle junk
> codegen.  :-)

Green again.  I've also bumped the snapshot version to 20140330. :)

http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/?projectid=2


More information about the D.gnu mailing list