PDF version of D manuals

[Carlos Santander]

Anders F Björklund escribió:
> Steve Horne wrote:
> 
>>> I would prefer adding a proper support for D syntax and semantics to
>>> doxygen. There's not much point in reinventing the wheel again.
>>
>> Yes, but then adding D support to Doxygen is re-inventing the wheel in
>> the sense that Doxygen then has to parse and understand D.
> 
> Doxygen currently understands a simple subset of "D 1.0",
> even if doesn't understand much of templates and "D 2.0".
> (Currently using it instead of Ddoc, which just outputs
> blank for all code that doesn't have any comments added ?)
> 

You know, that I'd like. Maybe a switch (-Ddocall) to tell ddoc to output 
everything?

> We've been using this to share docs between D/C#/Java,
> that also have one "native" documentation format each.
> I'm sure the D support in Doxygen could be improved...
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DoxygenIssues
> 
> But for the D "manual" (specification), there are probably
> better formats to use than those done for commenting code ?
> 
> --anders


-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal