DMD 0.166 release
Russ Lewis
spamhole-2001-07-16 at deming-os.org
Tue Sep 5 19:25:10 PDT 2006
Walter Bright wrote:
> Yes, it would be the same. But I think the interface should be set by
> the definition, not the use. That's the usual practice with programming
> languages, and I've never seen it raised as an issue before.
By that logic, shouldn't I be able to pass a delegate to a function with
pass-by-value semantics and have the delegate get automagically called
and converted into a value?
Assuming that you'll answer "no," they why is it ok for it to work the
other way around?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list